I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-601/16 P) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Appeal - Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Pharmaceutical products - Market for antidepressant medicines (citalopram) - Settlement agreements concerning process patents concluded between a manufacturer of originator medicines holding those patents and manufacturers of generic medicines - Article 101 TFEU - Potential competition - Restriction by object - Characterisation - Calculation of the amount of the fine)
(2021/C 206/05)
Language of the case: English
Appellants: Arrow Group ApS, Arrow Generics Ltd (represented by: C. Firth, S. Kon and C. Humpe, Solicitors)
Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: F. Castilla Contreras, T. Vecchi, B. Mongin and C. Vollrath, acting as Agents, and by B. Rayment and D. Bailey, Barristers, and by G. Peretz QC, and S. Kingston, Senior Counsel)
Intervener in support of the European Commission: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented: initially by D. Guðmundsdóttir, Z. Lavery, and D. Robertson, acting as Agents, and by J. Holmes QC, and subsequently by D. Guðmundsdóttir, acting as Agent, and by J. Holmes QC)
The Court:
1.Dismisses the appeal;
2.Orders Arrow Group ApS and Arrow Generics Ltd to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;
3.Orders the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to bear its own costs.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 30, 30.1.2017.