- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-481/17: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 May 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Veliko Tarnovo — Bulgaria) — Nikolay Yanchev v Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika’ Veliko Tarnovo pri Tsentralno upravlenie na Natsionalnata agentsia za prihodite (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Aid scheme authorised by the European Commission — Investment aid in the agricultural sector — Tax exemption — Tax relief on corporation tax — Conditions — Refusal to grant individual aid under that aid scheme)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017CB0481
62017CB0481
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-481/17) (*1)
Language of the case: Bulgarian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Nikolay Yanchev
Defendant: Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika’ Veliko Tarnovo pri Tsentralno upravlenie na Natsionalnata agentsia za prihodite
Operative part of the order
Decision C(2011) 863 final of the Commission of 11 February 2011, concerning the award of State aid pursuant to Articles 107 TFEU and 108 TFEU and authorising State aid No 546/2010 of the Republic of Bulgaria for investment in agricultural holdings in the form of corporation tax relief, must be interpreted as not precluding that Member State from refusing the award of State aid under that scheme on the ground that the applicant does not meet a condition, laid down in national law, according to which no aid can be awarded to a taxpayer who has debts towards the State, notwithstanding the fact that that decision does not expressly lay down such a condition.
* * *
(*1) OJ C 369, 30.10.2017.