EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Joined Cases T-91/12 and T-280/12: Judgment of the General Court of 26 September 2014 — Flying Holding and Others v Commission (Public service contracts — Tendering procedure — Provision of non-scheduled passenger transport services by air and chartered air-taxi service — Rejection of the application — Article 94(b) of the Financial Regulation — Rights of the defence — Article 134(5) of the Regulation implementing the Financial Regulation — Action for annulment — Letter in response to a question from the applicants — Act not amenable to review — Award decision — Lack of direct concern — Inadmissible — Non-contractual liability)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62012TA0091

62012TA0091

September 26, 2014
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

10.11.2014

Official Journal of the European Union

C 395/35

(Joined Cases T-91/12 and T-280/12) (*)

((Public service contracts - Tendering procedure - Provision of non-scheduled passenger transport services by air and chartered air-taxi service - Rejection of the application - Article 94(b) of the Financial Regulation - Rights of the defence - Article 134(5) of the Regulation implementing the Financial Regulation - Action for annulment - Letter in response to a question from the applicants - Act not amenable to review - Award decision - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissible - Non-contractual liability))

(2014/C 395/41)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Flying Holding NV (Wilrijk, Belgium), Flying Group Lux SA (Luxembourg, Luxembourg), and Flying Service NV (Deurne, Belgium) (represented by: C. Doutrelepont and V. Chapoulaud, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially by S. Delaude and D. Calciu, acting as Agents, and subsequently by S. Delaude, assisted by V. Vanden Acker, lawyer)

Re:

Action for annulment of (i) the decisions contained in the letters from the Commission of 15 December 2011 and 17 January 2012 rejecting the application submitted by the applicants in the context of a restricted tendering procedure concerning the provision of non-scheduled passenger transport services by air and chartered air-taxi service (OJ 2011/S 192-312059) and (ii) the Commission’s decision of 28 February 2012 awarding the contract to another company, on the one hand, and a claim for damages on the other.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Dismisses the actions;

2.Orders Flying Holding NV, Flying Group Lux SA and Flying Service NV to pay the costs.

(*)

Language of the case: French.

ECLI:EU:C:2014:395

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia