- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-736/18: Judgment of the General Court of 28 November 2019 — Runnebaum Invest v EUIPO — Berg Toys Beheer (Bergsteiger) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Bergsteiger — Earlier Benelux word marks and EU figurative and word marks BERG — Relative ground for refusal — Article 47(1) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Admissibility of a request for proof of genuine use — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018TA0736
62018TA0736
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
27.1.2020
Official Journal of the European Union
C 27/33
(Case T-736/18) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark Bergsteiger - Earlier Benelux word marks and EU figurative and word marks BERG - Relative ground for refusal - Article 47(1) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Admissibility of a request for proof of genuine use - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001)
(2020/C 27/41)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Runnebaum Invest GmbH (Diepholz, Germany) (represented by: W. Prinz, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo and H. O’Neill, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Berg Toys Beheer BV (Ede, Netherlands) (represented by: E. van Gelderen, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 October 2018 (Case R 572/2018-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Berg Toys Beheer and Runnebaum Invest.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 22 October 2018 (Case R 572/2018-4);
2.Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Runnebaum Invest GmbH;
3.Orders Berg Toys Beheer BV to bear its own costs.
(<span class="note"> <a id="ntr1-C_2020027EN.01003301-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2020027EN.01003301-E0001">*1</a> </span>) OJ C 65, 18.2.2019.