I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-612/21, (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span> Gmina O.)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Taxation - Value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Article 2(1)(a) and (c) - Supply of goods and services for consideration - Article 9(1) - Meanings of ‘taxable person’ and ‘economic activity’ - Municipality which organises the installation of renewable energy on its territory for its residents who own immovable property and who have expressed the wish to be equipped with renewable energy systems - Their contribution amounting to 25 % of the subsidisable costs, without being able to exceed a maximum value agreed between the municipality and the interested property owner - Reimbursement of the municipality by a subsidy from the competent provincial authority of 75 % of the subsidisable costs - Article 13(1) - Municipalities not subject to tax for the activities or transactions carried out as public authorities)
(2023/C 179/05)
Language of the case: Polish
Applicant: Gmina O.
Defendant: Dyrektor Krajowej Informacji Skarbowej
Article 2(1), Article 9(1) and Article 13(1) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax
must be interpreted as meaning that the fact that a municipality supplies and installs, through an undertaking, renewable energy systems for its residents who own their property and who have expressed their wish to be equipped with renewable energy systems, where such an activity is not intended to obtain income on a continuing basis and gives rise, on the part of those residents, solely to a payment covering at most one quarter of the costs incurred, the balance being financed by public funds, does not constitute a supply of goods and services subject to value added tax.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 95, 28.2.2022.
* * *