I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-43/10) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Markets for tin stabilisers and ESBO/esters heat stabilisers - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement - Withdrawal of the decision - Disappearance of the subject-matter of the proceedings - No need to adjudicate)
2012/C 6/29
Language of the case: English
Applicants: Elementis plc (London, United Kingdom); Elementis Holdings Ltd (London); Elementis UK Ltd (London); and Elementis Services Ltd (London) (represented by: T. Wessely, A. de Brousse, lawyers, A. Woods, Solicitor, and E. Spinelli, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Ronkes Agerbeek and J. Bourke, acting as Agents, and by J. Holmes, Barrister)
APPLICATION for annulment of Commission Decision C(2009) 8682 final of 11 November 2009 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/38.589 — Heat stabilisers), in so far as it concerns the applicants, as well as, in the alternative, an application for a reduction in the fines imposed on the applicants under that decision.
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
2.The European Commission shall pay the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 100, 17.4.2010.