I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
15.7.2024
(Plant varieties - Invalidity proceedings - Grant of a Community plant variety right for the variety Sempervivum Belsemred1 - Novelty of the variety - Distinctness of the variety - Article 20(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 - Articles 7 and 10 of Regulation No 2100/94 - Burden of proof - Lack of evidence)
(C/2024/4329)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Jaw de Croon Holding BV (Apeldoorn, Netherlands) (represented by: T. Overdijk, lawyer)
Defendant: Community Plant Variety Office (represented by: M. García-Moncó Fuente, F. Mattina and O. Lamberti, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of the CPVO, intervener before the General Court: Belgicactus (Westerlo, Belgium) (represented by: C. van den Heuvel, lawyer)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Board of Appeal of the Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO) of 16 December 2022 (Case A 24/2021).
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Jaw de Croon Holding BV to pay the costs.
—
Language of the case: English
(1) OJ C 121, 3.4.2023.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4329/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
* * *
—