- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-423/18: Action brought on 6 July 2018 — Fissler v EUIPO (vita)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018TN0423
62018TN0423
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-423/18)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: Fissler GmbH (Idar-Oberstein, Germany) (represented by: G. Hasselblatt and K. Middelhoff, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark ‘vita’ — Application for registration No 15 857 188
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 28 March 2018 in Case R 1326/2017-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 7(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.