I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Series C
18.3.2024
(Civil service - Members of the contract staff - Remuneration - Installation allowance - Compliance with a judgment of the General Court - Decision which was not contested in time - Conditional undertaking given in the context of an amicable settlement - Request for payment of installation allowance based on Article 90(1) of the Staff Regulations - Inadmissibility - Application for injunction - Manifest lack of jurisdiction)
(C/2024/2041)
Language of the case: French
Applicant: TO (represented by: É. Boigelot, lawyer)
Defendant: European Environment Agency (represented by: O. Cornu, acting as Agent, supported by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)
By her application based on Article 270 TFEU, the applicant requests in essence, in the first place, that the European Environment Agency (EEA) is ordered to pay, first, an amount of EUR 2 950, corresponding to the advance on the installation allowance deducted from the sums paid to her in compliance with the judgment of 11 June 2019, TO v EEA (T-462/17, not published, EU:T:2019:397), together with an annual interest rate of 5 % from 1 August 2019 and, secondly, an amount of EUR 22 000 as compensation for the material and non-material harm that she has suffered. In the second place, the applicant requests to be provided with an explanation to understand the additional deduction of EUR 500 that appeared on her pay slip for the month of August 2019 and, where appropriate, that she is reimbursed this amount if that recovery is unfounded.
1.The action is dismissed in part due to the manifest lack of jurisdiction of the General Court to hear and determine it, in part for being inadmissible, and in part for manifestly lacking any foundation in law.
2.TO is ordered to pay the costs.
OJ C/2023/50, 9.10.2023.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2041/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)