EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-417/23: Order of the General Court of 11 January 2024 — TO v EEA (Civil service — Members of the contract staff — Remuneration — Installation allowance — Compliance with a judgment of the General Court — Decision which was not contested in time — Conditional undertaking given in the context of an amicable settlement — Request for payment of installation allowance based on Article 90(1) of the Staff Regulations — Inadmissibility — Application for injunction — Manifest lack of jurisdiction)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TB0417

62023TB0417

January 11, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

Series C

C/2024/2041

18.3.2024

(Case T-417/23)

(Civil service - Members of the contract staff - Remuneration - Installation allowance - Compliance with a judgment of the General Court - Decision which was not contested in time - Conditional undertaking given in the context of an amicable settlement - Request for payment of installation allowance based on Article 90(1) of the Staff Regulations - Inadmissibility - Application for injunction - Manifest lack of jurisdiction)

(C/2024/2041)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: TO (represented by: É. Boigelot, lawyer)

Defendant: European Environment Agency (represented by: O. Cornu, acting as Agent, supported by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Re:

By her application based on Article 270 TFEU, the applicant requests in essence, in the first place, that the European Environment Agency (EEA) is ordered to pay, first, an amount of EUR 2 950, corresponding to the advance on the installation allowance deducted from the sums paid to her in compliance with the judgment of 11 June 2019, TO v EEA (T-462/17, not published, EU:T:2019:397), together with an annual interest rate of 5 % from 1 August 2019 and, secondly, an amount of EUR 22 000 as compensation for the material and non-material harm that she has suffered. In the second place, the applicant requests to be provided with an explanation to understand the additional deduction of EUR 500 that appeared on her pay slip for the month of August 2019 and, where appropriate, that she is reimbursed this amount if that recovery is unfounded.

Operative part of the order

1.The action is dismissed in part due to the manifest lack of jurisdiction of the General Court to hear and determine it, in part for being inadmissible, and in part for manifestly lacking any foundation in law.

2.TO is ordered to pay the costs.

OJ C/2023/50, 9.10.2023.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2041/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia