- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-680/17: Action brought on 4 October 2017 — Helibética v SRB
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TN0680
62017TN0680
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
11.12.2017
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 424/49
(Case T-680/17)
(2017/C 424/72)
Language of the case: Spanish
Parties
Applicant: Helibética, SL (Alicante, Spain) (represented by: R. Vallina Hoset and A. Lois Perreau de Pinninck, lawyers)
Defendant: Single Resolution Board
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the General Court should:
—Declare that the Single Resolution Board has incurred non-contractual liability and order it to repair the harm suffered by the applicant as a result of both its actions and its omissions which deprived the applicant of the BANCO POPULAR ESPAÑOL, S.A. bonds and securities it owned;
—Order the Board to pay the applicant EUR 50 000 as compensation for the harm suffered (‘the amount due’):
—Principally, the reimbursement of the investments made, namely EUR 1 010 677,50 in Banco Popular shares;
—In the alternative to the above claim, EUR 514 957;
—Increase the amount due with compensatory interest as of 7 June 2017 until delivery of the judgment disposing of the present case;
—Increase the amount due with corresponding default interest as of the date of delivery of judgment until its payment in full, at the rate set by the European Central Bank (ECB) for main refinancing operations, increased by two percentage points.
—Order the SRB to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those relied on in Case T-659/17 Vallina Fonseca v SRB.