- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-594/22: Action brought on 23 September 2022 — Cyprus v EUIPO — Kolios (HALLOUMAKI)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TN0594
62022TN0594
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
14.11.2022
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 432/32
(Case T-594/22)
(2022/C 432/40)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Republic of Cyprus (represented by: S. Malynicz, Barrister-at-Law)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Kolios AE Elliniki Viomichania Galaktos (Kilkis, Greece)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark HALLOUMAKI — Application for registration No 18 126 405
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 June 2022 in Case R 19/2022-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order that EUIPO and the other party to the proceedings before the EUIPO each bear their own costs and pay those of the applicant.
Pleas in law
—The Board of Appeal infringed Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council by wrongly interpreting the services covered by the contested mark;
—The Board of Appeal infringed Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council by failing to hold that consumers and the professional public could make a link between the specified services and the specified goods.