- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Cases T-588/22 and T-660/22: Order of the General Court of 18 October 2023 — Renco Valore and Seopult v Commission (Madeira Free Zone) (State aid — Madeira Free Zone — Aid scheme implemented by Portugal — Decision finding that the scheme does not comply with Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final, declaring it to be incompatible with the internal market and ordering the recovery of aid paid under that scheme — Concept of ‘existing aid’ within the meaning of Article 1(b)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 — Recovery — Legitimate expectations — Legal certainty — Additional pleas put forward by the intervener — Admissibility — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TB0588
62022TB0588
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
Series C
C/2024/451
(Cases T-588/22 and T-660/22) (*)
(State aid - Madeira Free Zone - Aid scheme implemented by Portugal - Decision finding that the scheme does not comply with Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final, declaring it to be incompatible with the internal market and ordering the recovery of aid paid under that scheme - Concept of ‘existing aid’ within the meaning of Article 1(b)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 - Recovery - Legitimate expectations - Legal certainty - Additional pleas put forward by the intervener - Admissibility - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
(C/2024/451)
Language of the case: Portuguese
Parties
Applicant in Case T-588/22: Renco Valore SpA (Pesaro, Italy) (represented by: A. Gaspar Schwalbach, C. Pinto Xavier and M. Cotrim, lawyers)
Applicant in Case T-660/22: Seopult LTD (Limassol, Cyprus) (represented by: A. Gaspar Schwalbach, C. Pinto Xavier and M. Cotrim, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: I. Barcew and P. Caro de Sousa, acting as Agents)
Intervener in support of the applicant in Case T-660/22: Grapevine Investimentos e Serviços, Lda (Zona Franca da Madeira) (Funchal, Portugal) (represented by: A. Gaspar Schwalbach and C. Pinto Xavier, lawyers)
Re:
By their action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek the annulment of Articles 1, 4 and 5 of Commission Decision (EU) 2022/1414 of 4 December 2020 on aid scheme SA.21259 (2018/C) (ex 2018/NN) implemented by Portugal for Zona Franca da Madeira (ZFM) — Regime III (OJ 2022 L 217, p. 49).
Operative part of the order
1.Cases T-588/22 and T-660/22 are joined for the purposes of the order.
2.The actions are dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law.
3.Renco Valore SpA and Seopult LTD shall pay the costs.
4.Grapevine Investimentos e Serviços, Lda (Zona Franca da Madeira) shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission relating to its intervention.
(*)
Language of the case: Portuguese.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/451/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
* * *
ECLI:EU:C:2025:140