- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-591/20: Action brought on 28 September 2020 — Unimax Stationery v EUIPO — Mitsubishi Pencil (UNI-MAX)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TN0591
62020TN0591
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
16.11.2020
Official Journal of the European Union
C 390/40
(Case T-591/20)
(2020/C 390/58)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Unimax Stationery (Daman, India) (represented by: A. Hempel and C. Schmidt, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Mitsubishi Pencil Co. Ltd (Tokyo, Japan)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark UNI-MAX in orange, red, white and black — European Union trade mark No 14 466 932
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 July 2020 in Case R 371/2020-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 60(1)(a) in conjunction of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.