- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-411/22, Thermalhotel Fontana: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 June 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof — Austria) — Thermalhotel Fontana Hotelbetriebsgesellschaft mbH (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social security — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Article 3(1)(a) — Concept of ‘sickness benefits’ — Scope — Freedom of movement for workers — Article 45 TFEU — Regulation (EC) No 492/2011 — Article 7(2) — Social advantages — Difference in treatment — Justifications — COVID-19 — Isolation of employees ordered by the national health authority — Compensation of those employees by the employer — Reimbursement of the employer by the competent authority — Exclusion of frontier workers required to isolate under a measure taken by the authority of their State of residence)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022CA0411
62022CA0411
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
31.7.2023
Official Journal of the European Union
C 271/9
(Case C-411/22, (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>) Thermalhotel Fontana)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Social security - Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 - Article 3(1)(a) - Concept of ‘sickness benefits’ - Scope - Freedom of movement for workers - Article 45 TFEU - Regulation (EC) No 492/2011 - Article 7(2) - Social advantages - Difference in treatment - Justifications - COVID-19 - Isolation of employees ordered by the national health authority - Compensation of those employees by the employer - Reimbursement of the employer by the competent authority - Exclusion of frontier workers required to isolate under a measure taken by the authority of their State of residence)
(2023/C 271/11)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Thermalhotel Fontana Hotelbetriebsgesellschaft mbH
Intervener: Bezirkshauptmannschaft Südoststeiermark
Operative part of the judgment
1.Article 3(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems
must be interpreted as meaning that compensation, financed by the State, which is due to workers for the pecuniary disadvantages caused by the impediment to their employment during their isolation as persons infected with, suspected of being infected with, or suspected of being contagious with COVID-19 does not constitute a ‘sickness benefit’, referred to in that provision, and does not therefore come within the scope of that regulation.
2.Article 45 TFEU and Article 7 of Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on freedom of movement for workers within the Union
must be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State under which the granting of compensation for loss of earnings suffered by workers as a result of isolation ordered following a positive COVID-19 test result is subject to the condition that the imposition of the isolation measure be ordered by an authority of that Member State under that legislation.
Language of the case: German
* * *
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 359, 19.9.2022.