EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-250/19: Action brought on 15 April 2019 — Tradición CZ v EUIPO — Rivero Argudo (TRADICIÓN CZ, S.L.)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TN0250

62019TN0250

April 15, 2019
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

3.6.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 187/88

(Case T-250/19)

(2019/C 187/95)

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Tradición CZ, SL (Jerez de la Frontera, Spain) (represented by: M. Aznar Alonso, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: María Dolores Rivero Argudo (Jerez de la Frontera, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for the EU word mark TRADICIÓN CZ, S.L. — Application for registration No 14 977 045

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 February 2019 in Case R 257/2018-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Stay the present proceedings until a final decision is taken in the revocation proceedings against the opposing trade mark No 7272594 RIVERO CZ (proceedings 33785-C) before EUIPO.

Declare the first plea well founded, annul the contested decision and find that there is no likelihood of confusion between the marks at issue.

In the alternative and cumulatively, declare the second plea well founded, annul the contested decision and find that there is no likelihood of confusion between the marks at issue in respect of the services in Class 35 relating to the sale of vinegars and musts.

Order EUIPO and the other party, should she appear in the present proceedings, to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia