I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(EAGF and EAFRD - Expenditure excluded from financing - Expenditure incurred by Hungary - Conformity clearance - Active farmer - Concept of ‘group of natural or legal persons’ - Samples to take into account for increasing the rate of on-the-spot checks of animal-related aid - Notification of animal events - Irregularities - Consequences)
(C/2024/7023)
Language of the case: Hungarian
Applicant: Hungary (represented by: M. Fehér and G. Koós, acting as Agents)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Aquilina, A. Becker and Zs. Teleki, acting as Agents)
By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, Hungary seeks the annulment of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/908 of 8 June 2022 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ 2022 L 157, p. 15), in so far as that decision relates to expenditure that it incurred, first, for decoupled direct aids and voluntary coupled support in respect of the financial years 2017 to 2019 and, second, for measures subject to the Integrated Administration and Control System (IACS) and to risk management in respect of the financial years 2017 and 2018.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Hungary to pay the costs.
—
Language of the case: Hungarian.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7023/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
* * *