EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-475/07: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2011 — Dow AgroSciences and Others v Commission (Plant-protection products — Active substance trifluralin — Non-inclusion in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC — Action for annulment — Evaluation procedure — New study and additional study — Time-limits — Concepts of risk and hazard — Manifest error of assessment — Draft review report — Draft directive or decision — Time-limits — Consequences of possible non-compliance — Legitimate expectations — Principle of proportionality — Decision 1999/468/EC ( the comitology decision ) — Regulation (EC) No 850/2004 — Article 3(3) — Plea of illegality)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62007TA0475

62007TA0475

September 9, 2011
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

22.10.2011

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/35

(Case T-475/07)( <span class="super">1</span> )

(Plant-protection products - Active substance trifluralin - Non-inclusion in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC - Action for annulment - Evaluation procedure - New study and additional study - Time-limits - Concepts of ‘risk’ and ‘hazard’ - Manifest error of assessment - Draft review report - Draft directive or decision - Time-limits - Consequences of possible non-compliance - Legitimate expectations - Principle of proportionality - Decision 1999/468/EC (‘the comitology decision’) - Regulation (EC) No 850/2004 - Article 3(3) - Plea of illegality)

2011/C 311/61

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Dow AgroSciences Ltd (Hitchin, United Kingdom) and the 20 other applicants, the names of which are listed in the Annex (represented by: C. Mereu and K. Van Maldegem, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Parpala and B. Doherty, acting as Agents, assisted by J. Stuyck, lawyer)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2007/629/EC of 20 September 2007 concerning the non-inclusion of trifluralin in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC and the withdrawal of authorisations for plant protection products containing that substance (OJ 2007 L 255, p. 42).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Dismisses the action;

2.Orders Dow AgroSciences Ltd and the 20 other applicants, the names of which are listed in the Annex, to bear their own costs and also to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 51, 23.2.2008.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia