EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-509/09: Action brought on 18 December 2009 — Portugal v Commission

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62009TN0509

62009TN0509

December 18, 2009
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

27.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 80/26

(Case T-509/09)

2010/C 80/47

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Applicant: Portuguese Republic (Lisbon, Portugal) (represented by: L. Inez Fernandes, A. Trindade Mimoso and A. Miranda Boavida, acting as Agents)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

1.Annulment of the European Commission’s decision of 14 October 2009, notified to the Portuguese Government by letter No 11656, refusing to reimburse the amount of the contribution originally approved for the purchase of two Ocean Patrol Vessels (OPV) for surveillance of fishing activities, in the sum of EUR 11 025 000;

2.an order that the defendant should adopt a favourable decision with regard to the requests for reimbursement made by the Portuguese Government in connection with European Commission Decision 2002/978/EC of 10 December 2002;

3.an order that the European Commission should pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

(a)Error as regards the legal requirements, given that the Portuguese State has complied in full with all the rules in the sphere of public procurement;

(b)error as to the facts;

(c)breach of the obligation to state reasons: the contested decision does not contain any grounds whatsoever, however slight, justifying the decision adopted. Inasmuch as it is contrary to and profoundly affects duly consolidated legal situations in a Member State, so causing the latter serious damage, such a decision ought, more than any other, to contain solid and persuasive reasoning, of which there is absolutely none in this case.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia