- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-514/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší soud České republiky (Czech Republic) lodged on 2 November 2010 — Wolf Naturprodukte GmbH v Sewar spol. s r. o.
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62010CN0514
62010CN0514
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
15.1.2011
Official Journal of the European Union
C 13/20
(Case C-514/10)
()
2011/C 13/37
Language of the case: Czech
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Wolf Naturprodukte GmbH
Respondent: Sewar spol. s r. o.
Question referred
Must Article 66(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (‘the Brussels I Regulation’) be interpreted as meaning that for that regulation to take effect it is necessary that at the time of delivery of a judgment the regulation was in force both in the State whose court delivered the judgment and in the State in which a party seeks to have that judgment recognised and enforced?
Language of the case: Czech
* * *
(1) OJ 2001 L 12, p. 1.