I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
2014/C 245/23
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: PSL Ltd (Kowloon, Hong-Kong) (represented by: R. Dissmann and J. Bogatz, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Consortium Ménager Parisien (Paris, France)
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—Annul the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 20 January 2014 in Case R 1495/2012-3;
—Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings before the court as well as the appeal proceedings before the Board of Appeals.
Registered Community design in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: Design representing a watch for goods in Class 10-02 — Community Design No 1 600 560-0001
Proprietor of the Community design: The applicant
Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community design: Consortium Menager Parisien
Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity: Lack of individual character within the meaning of Article 6(1)(b) of Regulation No 6/2002
Decision of the Cancellation Division: Rejected the application for invalidity
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulled the contested decision and declared the contested design invalid
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 6 of Regulation No 6/2002