EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-212/14: Action brought on 31 March 2014 — PSL/OHIM — Consortium Ménager Parisien (Representation of a watch)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014TN0212

62014TN0212

March 31, 2014
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

28.7.2014

Official Journal of the European Union

C 245/17

(Case T-212/14)

2014/C 245/23

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: PSL Ltd (Kowloon, Hong-Kong) (represented by: R. Dissmann and J. Bogatz, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Consortium Ménager Parisien (Paris, France)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Annul the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 20 January 2014 in Case R 1495/2012-3;

Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings before the court as well as the appeal proceedings before the Board of Appeals.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community design in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: Design representing a watch for goods in Class 10-02 — Community Design No 1 600 560-0001

Proprietor of the Community design: The applicant

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community design: Consortium Menager Parisien

Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity: Lack of individual character within the meaning of Article 6(1)(b) of Regulation No 6/2002

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Rejected the application for invalidity

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulled the contested decision and declared the contested design invalid

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 6 of Regulation No 6/2002

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia