- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-142/16: Order of the General Court of 9 February 2017 — Dröge and Others v Commission (Action for annulment — Declaration of intent and two Commission decisions on the arrangements for accessing documents concerning the negotiations on a transatlantic trade and investment partnership between the European Union and the United States (TTIP) — Right of access of staff of members of national parliaments to certain confidential documents relating to the TTIP negotiations — Measures against which no action may be brought — Inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TB0142
62016TB0142
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
10.4.2017
Official Journal of the European Union
C 112/36
(Case T-142/16) (<a id="ntc1-C_2017112EN.01003601-E0001" href="#ntr1-C_2017112EN.01003601-E0001"> (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)</a>)
((Action for annulment - Declaration of intent and two Commission decisions on the arrangements for accessing documents concerning the negotiations on a transatlantic trade and investment partnership between the European Union and the United States (TTIP) - Right of access of staff of members of national parliaments to certain confidential documents relating to the TTIP negotiations - Measures against which no action may be brought - Inadmissibility))
(2017/C 112/49)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicants: Katharina Dröge (Berlin, Germany), Britta Haßelmann (Berlin), Anton Hofreiter (Berlin) (represented by: Professor W. Cremer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Erlbacher, R. Vidal Puig and B. Hartmann, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking (i) annulment of the Commission’s declaration of intent concerning the conclusion of a treaty binding on the contracting parties — the European Union and the United States of America — as regards the arrangements for accessing documents concerning the negotiations on a transatlantic trade and investment partnership (TTIP), and, in the alternative, a declaration that it is contrary to EU law; (ii) annulment of the Commission’s prior decision concerning the submission of the aforementioned declaration of intent on the authorisation of the agreement and (iii) annulment of the Commission’s oral decision connected with the conclusion of a treaty or a non-binding political agreement with the United States of America on the ‘TTIP access regime’ and classifying that regime as binding under EU law, in so far as it strictly prohibits members of the parliaments of the Member States from being accompanied by vetted staff, including staff of their political group, when viewing documents relating to the TTIP in reading rooms established for that purpose.
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
2.Katharina Dröge, Britta Haßelmann and Anton Hofreiter are ordered to pay the costs.
(<a id="ntr1-C_2017112EN.01003601-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2017112EN.01003601-E0001">(<span class="super">1</span>)</a> <a href="./../../../../legal-content/EN/AUTO/?uri=OJ:C:2016:221:TOC">OJ C 221, 13.6.2016</a>.)