EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-182/11: Action brought on 28 March 2011 — Dacoury-Tabley v Council

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011TN0182

62011TN0182

March 28, 2011
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

21.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 152/29

(Case T-182/11)

2011/C 152/51

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Philippe Henry Dacoury-Tabley (Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire) (represented by: G. Collard, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Forms of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

declare that, concerning the applicant, Mr Philippe Henry DACOURY-TABLEY, Council Regulation No 85/2011 of 31 January 2011, published on 2 February 2011 in the Official Journal of the European Union, and Council Decision 2011/71/CFSP of 31 January 2011, published on 2 February 2011 in the Official Journal of the European Union, have no factual basis,

accordingly,

annul Council Regulation No 85/2011 of 31 January 2011 and Council Decision 2011/71/CFSP of 31 Janaury 2011

in the alternative, order that the name of Mr Philippe Henry DACOURY-TABLEY be removed from the list annexed to that Regulation and Decision.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.

1.First plea in law, alleging breach of the obligation to state reasons, since the reasons for including the applicant in the list of persons and entities to which the restrictive measures apply are stereotypical, with no mention of any precise factual evidence which allow the assessment of the relevance of that inclusion,

2.Second plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment in so far as

the applicant is alleged to have refused recognise the authority of M. A. Ouattara, although he attempted to subject the BCEAO (Central Bank of West African States) for which he was governor, to his authority;

the applicant is alleged to have helped to fund the illegitimate administration of M. L. Gbagbo, although such support cannot be inferred from the operations of the BCEAO;

in addition, the applicant was no longer governor of the BCEAO at the time of adoption of the contested Regulation and Decision.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia