EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.
Case C-355/24 P: Appeal brought on 16 May 2024 by Puma SE against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 06/03/2024 in Case T-647/22, Puma v EUIPO – Handelsmaatschappij J. Van Hilst (Shoe)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024CN0355
62024CN0355
May 16, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2024/6401
(Case C-355/24 P)
(C/2024/6401)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellant: Puma SE (represented by: M. Schunke and P. Trieb, Rechtsanwälte)
Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), Handelsmaatschappij J. Van Hilst BV
By order of 24 September 2024, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) held that the appeal was not allowed to proceed and that Puma SE should bear its own costs.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6401/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
EurLex Case Law
AI-Powered Case Law Search
Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions
Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free TrialAt Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.