- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case F-76/15: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 28 April 2016 — FY v Council (Civil service — Social security — Joint Sickness Insurance Scheme — Reimbursement of medical expenses — Reimbursement rate — Recognition of a serious illness — Criteria — Article 72 of the Staff Regulations and the General Implementing Provisions for the reimbursement of medical expenses)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015FA0076
62015FA0076
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 222/37
(Case F-76/15) (1)
((Civil service - Social security - Joint Sickness Insurance Scheme - Reimbursement of medical expenses - Reimbursement rate - Recognition of a serious illness - Criteria - Article 72 of the Staff Regulations and the General Implementing Provisions for the reimbursement of medical expenses))
(2016/C 222/47)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: FY (represented by: J.-N. Louis and N. de Montigny, lawyers)
Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and M. Veiga, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application for annulment of the decision of the Brussels Settlements Office rejecting the application for extension of the recognition of the illness suffered by the applicant’s son as a serious illness and for the medical expenses connected therewith to be reimbursed at 100 %.
Operative part of the judgment
The Tribunal:
1)Annuls the decision of 8 April 2014 of the Brussels (Belgium) Settlements Office for the Joint Sickness Insurance Scheme rejecting the application for extension of the recognition, as a serious illness, of the illness suffered by FY’s son;
2)Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs and is ordered to pay the costs incurred by FY.
(1) OJ C 245, 27/7/2015, p. 51.