- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-102/14: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2015 — Deutsche Post v OHIM — PostNL Holding (TPG POST) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark TPG POST — Earlier national and Community word marks POST and Deutsche Post — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014TA0102
62014TA0102
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
29.6.2015
Official Journal of the European Union
C 213/35
(Case T-102/14) (<span class="super">1</span>)
((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark TPG POST - Earlier national and Community word marks POST and Deutsche Post - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2015/C 213/58)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Deutsche Post AG (Bonn, Germany) (represented by: K. Hamacher and C. Giersdorf, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider and S. Hanne, Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: PostNL Holding BV (The Hague, Netherlands)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 December 2013 (Case R 2108/2012-1), relating to opposition proceedings between PostNL Holding BV and Deutsche Post AG.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the application.
2.Orders Deutsche Post AG to pay the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 112, 14.4.2014.