I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-162/18) (*)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark ALTUS - Earlier national word marks ALTOS - Revocation proceedings in respect of earlier marks initiated before national authorities - Likelihood of confusion - Suspension of the administrative proceedings - Rule 20(7)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 71(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625))
(2019/C 131/51)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Beko plc (Watford, United Kingdom) (represented by: G. Tritton, Barrister)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas and H. O’Neill, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Acer, Inc. (Taipei, Taiwan)
Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 December 2017 (Case R 1991/2016-5) relating to opposition proceedings between Acer and Beko.
The Court:
1.Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 13 December 2017 (Case R 1991/2016-5);
2.Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Beko plc.
(*)
Language of the case: English.
ECLI:EU:C:2019:140
(2019/C 131/51)