- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-343/11: Judgment of the General Court of 16 September 2013 — Netherlands v Commission (EAGGF — Guarantee Section — Expenditure excluded from financing — Fruits and vegetables — Exclusion of financing of costs of printing on packaging — Non-compliance with criteria for recognising a producers’ organisation — Exclusion of expenses of all members of the producers’ organisation in question — Proportionality)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011TA0343
62011TA0343
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
9.11.2013
Official Journal of the European Union
C 325/32
(Case T-343/11) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(EAGGF - Guarantee Section - Expenditure excluded from financing - Fruits and vegetables - Exclusion of financing of costs of printing on packaging - Non-compliance with criteria for recognising a producers’ organisation - Exclusion of expenses of all members of the producers’ organisation in question - Proportionality)
(2013/C 325/53)
Language of the case: Dutch
Parties
Applicant: Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented by: C. Wissels, M. de Ree, B. Koopman and C. Schillemans, subsequently by C. Wissels, M. de Ree and C. Schillemans, acting as Agents)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Bouquet and P. Rossi, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application for annulment of Commission Implementing Decision 2011/244/EU of 15 April 2011 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ 2011 L 102, p. 33) in so far as it concerns certain expenditure incurred by the Kingdom of the Netherlands.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders the Kingdom of the Netherlands to pay the costs.
* Language of the case: Dutch.
(1) OJ C 252, 27.8.2011