- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-311/19: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 December 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud — Czech Republic) — BONVER WIN, a.s. v Ministerstvo financí ČR (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Freedom to provide services — Restrictions — National legislation prohibiting the operation of gambling in certain places — Applicability of Article 56 TFEU — Existence of a cross-border element)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019CA0311
62019CA0311
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 35/12
(Case C-311/19)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Freedom to provide services - Restrictions - National legislation prohibiting the operation of gambling in certain places - Applicability of Article 56 TFEU - Existence of a cross-border element)
(2021/C 35/15)
Language of the case: Czech
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant: BONVER WIN, a.s.
Respondent: Ministerstvo financí ČR
Operative part of the judgment
Article 56 TFEU must be interpreted as meaning that it applies to the situation of a company established in a Member State which has lost its licence to operate games of chance following the entry into force, in that Member State, of legislation determining the places in which it is permitted to organise such games, which is applicable without distinction to all service providers operating in that Member State, regardless of whether those services are provided to nationals of that Member State or to those of other Member States, where some of its customers come from a Member State other than the Member State in which it is established.
(1) OJ C 213, 24.6.2019.