- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-484/14: Action brought on 26 June 2014 — Monthisa Residencial v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014TN0484
62014TN0484
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
11.8.2014
Official Journal of the European Union
C 261/52
(Case T-484/14)
2014/C 261/82
Language of the case: Spanish
Parties
Applicant: Monthisa Residencial, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: F. de Artíñano Rodríguez de Torres and J. Martínez Muro, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision in so far as it categorises the measures which, according to that decision, together constitute the ‘Spanish Tax Lease System’ as new State aid that is incompatible with the internal market;
—in the alternative, annul Articles 1 and 4 of the contested decision, which identify the investors in the Economic Interest Groupings (EIGs) as beneficiaries of the alleged aid and as the sole addressees of the order for recovery;
—in the alternative, annul Article 4 of the contested decision in so far as it orders recovery of the alleged aid in breach of general principles of EU law;
—order the Commission to pay the costs of these proceedings.
Pleas in law and main arguments
The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those put forward in Case T-700/13 Bankia v Commission.
In particular, it is alleged that Article 107(1) TFEU and the general principle of EU law relating to the protection of legitimate expectations have been infringed.