I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Series C
22.1.2024
(C/2024/756)
Language of the case: German
Applicant: IN tIME Express Logistik GmbH (Isernhagen, Germany) (represented by: T. Wittwer, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Trade mark at issue: Application for EU figurative mark inTime Agile Logistics — Application No 17 898 425
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 September 2023 in Case R 1134/2023-1
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order the defendant to adopt a new decision on the registration of EU trade mark application No 17 898 425 ‘inTime Agile Logistics’, taking account of the view of the General Court;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred before the General Court and in the appeal and examination procedure.
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Article 41(2)(c) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, and of Article 41(1), in conjunction with Article 20 and Article 21(1), of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.