I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-709/17) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
(Action for annulment - State aid - Aid implemented by Hungary in favour of companies employing disabled workers - Preliminary examination procedure - Alleged Commission decisions declaring the aid measure compatible with the internal market - Concept of ‘party concerned’ - No individual concern - Inadmissibility)
(2018/C 427/96)
Language of the case: Hungarian
Applicant: M-Sansz Kereskedelmi, Termelő és Szolgáltató Kft. (M-Sansz Kft.) (Pécs, Hungary) (represented by: L. Szabó, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Bottka and C. Georgieva-Kecsmar, acting as Agents)
Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the decisions that the Commission allegedly adopted concerning the complaints SA.29432 — CP 290/2009 — Hungary — Aid for the employment of disabled workers alleged to be unlawful due to the discriminatory nature of the legislation and SA. 45498 (FC/2016) — Complaint made by OPS Újpest-lift Kft. concerning the State aid granted between 2006 and 2012 to companies employing disabled workers.
1.The action is dismissed.
2.M-Sansz Kereskedelmi, Termelő és Szolgáltató Kft. (M-Sansz Kft.) shall pay the costs.
(<span class="note">1</span>) OJ C 437, 18.12.2017.