- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-678/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 5 November 2018 — Procureur-Generaal bij de Hoge Raad der Nederlanden
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018CN0678
62018CN0678
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
21.1.2019
Official Journal of the European Union
C 25/26
(Case C-678/18)
(2019/C 25/32)
Language of the case: Dutch
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant: Procureur-Generaal bij de Hoge Raad der Nederlanden
Question referred
Must Article 90(1) of Regulation No 6/2002 (1) be interpreted as requiring the mandatory granting, to all courts and tribunals of a Member State referred to therein, of jurisdiction to grant provisional and protective measures, or does it leave the Member States — in full or in part — free to delegate jurisdiction to grant such measures exclusively to the courts and tribunals which, in accordance with Article 80(1) of Regulation No 6/2002, have been designated as courts (of first and second instance) for Community design?
Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 of 12 December 2001 on Community designs (OJ 2002 L 3, pp 1-24).
*
Language of the case: Dutch
* * *