I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2016/C 175/22)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Airhole Facemasks, Inc. (Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada) (represented by: A. Michaels, Barrister and S. Barker, Solicitor)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: sindustrysurf, SL (Trapagaran, Spain)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark in black and white containing the word elements ‘AIRHOLE FACE MASKS YOU IDIOT’ — EU trade mark No 9 215 427
Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18/01/2016 in Case R 2547/2014-4
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—reverse the contested decision, and declare the EUTM invalid in its entirety, or alternatively annul the contested decision;
—order sindustrysurf, SL to pay the applicant’s costs of this appeal and of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal and to pay the costs ordered to be paid by the Cancellation Division.
—Infringement of Article 8(3) of Regulation No 207/2009;
—Infringement of Article 52(1)(b)of Regulation No 207/2009;
—Infringement of Article 53(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.