I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark PODOBEACH - Earlier national figurative mark PODO - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
(C/2025/3911)
Language of the case: German
Applicant: Johannes Ehrenreiter (Podersdorf am See, Austria) (represented by: S. Salomonowitz, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Klee, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Podersdorf Tourismus- und Freizeitbetriebsgesellschaft m.b.H. (Podersdorf am See) (represented by: W.M. Mosing, lawyer)
By his action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment and alteration of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 26 February 2024 (Case R 790/2023-2).
The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law.
Mr Johannes Ehrenreiter shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by Podersdorf Tourismus- und Freizeitbetriebsgesellschaft m.b.H.
The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear its own costs.
—
OJ C, C/2024/3797, 24.6.2024.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3911/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—