- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-259/14: Action brought on 24 April 2014 — Luxembourg v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014TN0259
62014TN0259
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 223/20
(Case T-259/14)
2014/C 223/25
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (represented by: L. Delvaux, Agent, and P.-E. Partsch, A. Steichen, D. Waelbroeck, lawyers, and D. Slater, Solicitor)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—declare the present action admissible and well founded;
—annul the Commission decision of 24 March 2014 requiring Luxembourg to provide information relating to the taxation scheme for revenue from intellectual property;
—order the Commission to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
By the present action, the applicant seeks annulment of Commission Decision C (2014) 1987 final by which the Commission directed the applicant, pursuant to Article 10(3) of Regulation No 659/1999, to provide information relating to the taxation scheme for revenue from intellectual property.
In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law which are essentially identical or similar to those raised in the context of Case T-258/14 Luxembourg v Commission.
Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (OJ 1999 L 83, p. 1).