I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
—
(State aid - State measures amending the existing aid granted to the Lithuanian public service broadcasting organisation LRT - Rejection of a complaint - Decision not to raise any objections - Action for annulment - Status as an interested party - Safeguarding of procedural rights - Admissibility - Serious difficulties - Substantial alteration to existing aid)
(C/2025/3513)
Language of the case: English
Applicants: Interneto žiniasklaidos asociacija (Vilnius, Lithuania), All Media Lithuania UAB (Vilnius), All Media Radijas UAB (Vilnius) (represented by: K. Kačerauskas, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Nicolae, acting as Agent)
Interveners in support of the defendant: Lietuvos nacionalinis radijas ir televizija VšĮ (Vilnius, Lithuania) (represented by: D. Miniotas, lawyer), European Broadcasting Union (EBU) (Grand-Saconnex, Switzerland) (represented by: D. Waelbroeck, D. Fosselard and J. Bracker, lawyers)
By their action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek the annulment of the letter from the European Commission bearing the reference COMP.C.4/KK/ASz/ao D(2021)7942463 of 25 November 2021 on State aid SA.57787 (2020/FC) – Lithuania – State aid to public service broadcaster LRT – LT.
The Court:
Annuls the letter from the European Commission bearing the reference COMP.C.4/KK/ASz/ao D(2021)7942463 of 25 November 2021 on State Aid SA.57787 (2020/FC) – Lithuania – State aid to public service broadcaster LRT – LT;
Orders the Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Interneto žiniasklaidos asociacija, All Media Lithuania UAB and All Media Radijas UAB;
Orders Lietuvos nacionalinis radijas ir televizija VšĮ and European Broadcasting Union (EBU) to bear their own costs.
—
(1) OJ C 171, 25.4.2022.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3513/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—