- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-444/22 P: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 June 2023 — Leon Leonard Johan Veen v European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) (Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Non-contractual liability — Law enforcement cooperation — Criminal intelligence — Alleged unauthorised disclosure of data — Regulation (EU) 2016/794 — Article 50(1) — Non-material damage — Action for damages — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022CB0444
62022CB0444
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 329/5
(Case C-444/22 P) (*)
(Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Non-contractual liability - Law enforcement cooperation - Criminal intelligence - Alleged unauthorised disclosure of data - Regulation (EU) 2016/794 - Article 50(1) - Non-material damage - Action for damages - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)
(2023/C 329/06)
Language of the case: Slovak
Parties
Appellant: Leon Leonard Johan Veen (represented by: M. Mandzák, advokát)
Other party to the proceedings: European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) (represented by: A. Nunzi, acting as Agent, and by M. Kottmann and G. Ziegenhorn, Rechtsanwälte)
Operative part of the order
1.The appeal is dismissed as being in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.
2.Mr Leon Leonard Johan Veen shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol).
(*)
Language of the case: Slovak.
OJ C 340, 5.9.2022.