- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Order of the Court (Third Chamber) of 23 February 2006. # Laurent Piau v Commission of the European Communities. # Appeal - Freedom to provide services - Competition - Regulation of the activities of players' agents - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded. # Case C-171/05 P.
ECLI:EU:C:2006:149
62005CO0171
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-171/05 P
Appeal – Freedom to provide services – Competition – Regulation of the activities of players’ agents – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded
4. Competition – Dominant position – Abuse – Meaning (Art. 82 EC) (see para. 37)
Re:
Appeal brought against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 26 January 2005 in Case T-193/02 Piau v Commission, in which the Court of First Instance dismissed the action for annulment of the Commission’s decision of 15 April 2002 rejecting the complaint lodged by the applicant concerning the regulation of the Fédération internationale de football association (FIFA) governing the activities of players’ agents
Operative part:
The Court:
1.Dismisses the appeal;
2.Orders Mr Piau to pay the costs of the present proceedings.