I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2023/C 296/37)
Language of the case: Swedish
Applicant: Volvo Personvagnar AB (Gothenburg, Sweden) (represented by: H.-A. Odh and E. Esaiasson, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Trade mark at issue: Application for an EU three-dimensional mark (Shape of headlights) — Application for registration No 18 560 591
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 9 March 2023 in Case R 1129/2022-5
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision under Article 72 EUTMR and alter the decision in order to approve the applicant’s application for registration of EU trade mark No 18 560 591;
—order the defendant, on the basis of Article 134 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court, to pay the applicant’s costs in both the proceedings before the Court and before the European Union Intellectual Property Office;
—treat the following evidence as confidential:
Annex A.1 — Statement by expert Aina Nilsson Ström and annex (CV)
Annex A.3 — Confirmation of a licence between Volvo Cars and Polestar.
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.