- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-97/24, The Minister for Children, Equality, Disability, Integration and Youth: Reference for a preliminary ruling from High Court (Ireland) made on 6 February 2024 – S.A., R.J. v The Minister for Children, Equality, Disability, Integration and Youth, Ireland, The Attorney General
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024CN0097
62024CN0097
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2024/3309
3.6.2024
(Case C-97/24, The Minister for Children, Equality, Disability, Integration and Youth)
(C/2024/3309)
Language of the case: English
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicants: S.A. and R.J.
Defendants: The Minister for Children, Equality, Disability, Integration and Youth, Ireland and the Attorney General
Questions referred
1.Where “force majeure” is not found as a defence in a Directive or implementing Regulations in issue, is such a defence nonetheless available as a defence to a Francovich damages claim for a breach of an EU law obligation that confers rights on individuals which derive from the fundamental right to human dignity contained in Article 1 of the Charter (whether as a defence within the second limb of the Brasserie du Pêcheur/Factortame test or otherwise)?
2.If the answer to question (1) is “yes”, what are the parameters and proper scope of that force majeure defence?
—
(1) ECLI:EU:C:1991:428.
(2) ECLI:EU:C:1996:79.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3309/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
—