- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-5/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof Amsterdam (Netherlands) lodged on 12 January 2015 — AK (*) v Achmea Schadeverzekeringen NV, Stichting Achmea Rechtsbijstand
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015CN0005
62015CN0005
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
30.3.2015
Official Journal of the European Union
C 107/19
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof Amsterdam (Netherlands) lodged on 12 January 2015 — AK (1) v Achmea Schadeverzekeringen NV, Stichting Achmea Rechtsbijstand
(Case C-5/15)
(2015/C 107/27)
Language of the case: Dutch
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: AK (1)
Defendants: Achmea Schadeverzekeringen NV, Stichting Achmea Rechtsbijstand
Question referred
Must the term ‘inquiry or proceedings’ in Article 4(1)(a) of Council Directive 87/344/EEC (1) of 22 June 1987 on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to legal expenses insurance be interpreted as also covering the objection stage before the CIZ [Netherlands Medical Care Assessment Centre], in which any person who has received a negative decision from the CIZ on a request for an assessment may lodge a notice of objection with the CIZ, requesting that the decision be reviewed?
(1) Information erased or replaced within the framework of protection of personal data and/or confidentiality.
(1) OJ 1987 L 185, p. 77.