EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 25 April 2007. # Maddalena Lebedef-Caponi v Commission of the European Communities. # Officials. # Case F-50/06.

ECLI:EU:F:2007:70

62006FJ0050

April 25, 2007
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

(Officials – Appraisal – Career development report – 2001/2002 appraisal – General Provisions for Implementing Article 43 of the Staff Regulations – Article 26 of the Staff Regulations)

Application: brought under Articles 236 EC and 152 EA, in which Ms Lebedef-Caponi seeks annulment of her career development report for the period 1 July 2001 to 31 December 2002.

Held: Ms Lebedef-Caponi’s career development report for the period 1 July 2001 to 31 December 2002 is annulled. The Commission is ordered to pay the costs.

Summary

Acts of the institutions – Withdrawal – Unlawful acts – Extent in the event of a procedural defect

Where the administration decides to withdraw an act because of a procedural defect in its adoption, just as where it replaces a decision annulled by the Community judicature because of a procedural defect, it has the discretion to repeat the whole of the adoption procedure without confining itself to what is necessary to rectify the defect identified. Consequently, if, when withdrawing an act, the administration gives the person concerned a formal assurance that it will repeat the adoption procedure from the beginning, it cannot, without breaching the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations, go back on the undertaking it has given by limiting the extent of the withdrawal merely to those phases of the procedure that were unlawful.

(see paras 38, 45-46)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia