- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-139/17: Action brought on 6 March 2017 — Kibelisa v Council
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TN0139
62017TN0139
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
24.4.2017
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 129/30
(Case T-139/17)
(2017/C 129/45)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Roger Kibelisa (Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo) (represented by: O. Okito, lawyer)
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul Regulation (EU) 2016/2230 implementing Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/2231 of 12 December 2016 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against persons acting in violation of the arms embargo with regard to the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and amending Decision 2010/788/CFSP, in so far as it concerns Roger Kibelisa;
—order the Council to bear its own costs, and to pay those of the applicant and of all the interveners.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging infringement of essential procedural requirements committed by the Council, in particular infringement of the applicant’s rights of defence, infringement of the Council's obligation to state reasons and infringement of the applicant’s right to an effective remedy.
2.Second plea in law, alleging infringement of general principles of EU law, in that the Council infringed the applicant’s right to property.