I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(Case F-17/16)
(2016/C 191/77)
Language of the case: German
Applicant: ZZ (represented by: H. Tettenborn, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission
Action for annulment of the decision of the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) not to have regard to the late request for review of the decision not to admit the applicant to the next stage of open competition EPSO/AST-SC/03/15 — 3 and for annulment of the implied decision not to grant that request for review.
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the decision of the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) of 17 August 2015, received by the applicant by e-mail, not to have regard to the applicant’s request of 13 August 2015 for review of the decision not to admit the applicant to the next stage of open competition EPSO/AST-SC/03/15 — 3 following the decision of the selection board in that competition;
—annul the implied decision of the selection board in open competition EPSO/AST-SC/03/15 — 3 not to grant the applicant’s request of 13 August 2015 for review of the decision of the selection board not to admit the applicant to the next stage of that competition;
—order the Commission to pay the entire costs.