EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Order of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber, extended composition) of 28 November 1996. # Associazione Italiana Tecnico Economica del Cemento v Commission of the European Communities. # Taxation of costs. # Case T-447/93 DEPE.

ECLI:EU:T:1996:174

61993TO0447

November 28, 1996
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Avis juridique important

61993B0447

European Court reports 1996 Page II-01631

Summary

Keywords

1 Procedure - Costs - Taxation - Factors to be taken into account (Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance, Arts 91(b) and 92(1))

2 Procedure - Costs - Taxation - Recoverable costs - Meaning - Involvement of more than one lawyer (Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance, Arts 91(b) and 92(1))

Summary

The Community judicature is not empowered to tax the fees payable by the parties to their own lawyers but may determine the amount of those fees which may be recovered from the party ordered to pay the costs. It follows that the Court is not obliged to take account of any national scales of lawyers' fees or any agreement concluded in that regard.

In the absence of Community provisions laying down fee scales, the Court must make an unfettered assessment of the facts of the case, taking into account the purpose and nature of the proceedings, their significance from the point of view of Community law, as well as the difficulties presented by the case, the amount of work generated by the dispute for the lawyer involved and the financial interest which the parties had in the proceedings.

Where a dispute presents particular difficulties, the remuneration of more than one lawyer may be regarded as falling within the ambit of `expenses necessarily incurred', within the meaning of Article 91(b) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia