EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.
Case C-36/19 P: Appeal brought on 21 January 2019 by Daico International BV against the order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 22 November 2018 in Case T-356/17: Daico International v EUIPO — American Franchise Marketing
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019CN0036
62019CN0036
January 21, 2019
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 280/16
(Case C-36/19 P)
(2019/C 280/21)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellant: Daico International BV (represented by: M. F. J. Haak, advocaat)
Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office
By order of 4 July 2019 the Court of Justice (Seventh Chamber) held that the appeal was inadmissible.
EurLex Case Law
AI-Powered Case Law Search
Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions
Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free TrialAt Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.