I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-207/09) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark NC NICKOL - Earlier Community figurative mark NIKE - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - No similarity between the signs - Article 8(5) of Regulation No 40/94)
2011/C 331/32
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Mustapha El Jirari Bouzekri (Malaga, Spain) (represented by: E. Ragot, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Nike International Ltd (Beaverton, Oregon, United States of America) (represented by: M. de Justo Bailey, lawyer)
ACTION brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 25 February 2009 (Case R 554/2008-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Nike International Ltd and Mustapha El Jirari Bouzekri.
The Court:
1.Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), of 25 February 2009 (Case R 554/2008-2).
2.Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Mustapha El Jirari Bouzekri. Nike International shall pay its own costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 167, 18.7.2009.