- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-345/20: Judgment of the General Court of 21 April 2021 — Robert Klingel v EUIPO (MEN+) (EU trade mark — Application for registration of the EU figurative mark MEN+ — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctiveness — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Examination of the facts — Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TA0345
62020TA0345
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 242/40
(Case T-345/20) (*)
(EU trade mark - Application for registration of the EU figurative mark MEN+ - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctiveness - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Examination of the facts - Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Obligation to state reasons)
(2021/C 242/56)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Robert Klingel OHG (Pforzheim, Germany) (represented by: M. Zick, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Hanf, acting as Agent)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 March 2020 (Case R 1906/2019-1) concerning an application for registration of the figurative sign MEN+ as an EU trade mark.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Robert Klingel OHG to pay the costs.
(*)
Language of the case: German.
ECLI:EU:C:2021:140
* * *
(1) OJ C 247, 27.7.2020.