I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2022/C 244/62)
Language in which the application was lodged: Polish
Applicant: ‘ANITA’ Grzegorz Mordalski (Działoszyn, Poland) (represented by: A. Korbela, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Anita Food, SA (Lima, Peru)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘ANITA’ — EU trade mark No 8 291 056
Proceedings before EUIPO: Invalidity proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 March 2022 in Case R 1616/2021-4
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 March 2022, delivered in Case R 1616/2021-4;
—annul the decision (preceding the aforementioned decision) of the Cancellation Division of EUIPO of 26 July 2021, delivered in Case No 000 047 106 C; and
—remit to EUIPO the application of 1 November 2020 seeking a declaration that the EU trade mark ANITA 008 291 056, registered in the name of Anita Food SA, Carretera Central No 869, Santa Anita, Lima 43, PERU, filed on 11 May 2009 and protected until 11 May 2019, is invalid.
—Incorrect interpretation of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council, resulting in the declaration that the invalidation of EU trade marks that have already expired is inadmissible.