- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-364/18: Action brought on 11 June 2018 — Arçelik v EUIPO (MicroGarden)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018TN0364
62018TN0364
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-364/18)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Arçelik AS (Istanbul, Turquie) (represented by: A. Franke, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark MicroGarden — Application for registration No 16 971 988
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 April 2018 in Case R 163/2018-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.